If these dog days of summer are feeling a little overwhelming this year, you can blame it in part on “corn sweat.” Yep, that’s a real thing.
It’s when plants release water vapor into the atmosphere in order to cool, similar to how humans sweat when it gets too hot out. We sweat through our pores, and corn sweats the same way, but through what’s called the stomata, its own tiny pores on the surface of their leaves or husks. The meteorological term for this process is “evapotranspiration.”
And although most of the country’s corn is farmed in the Midwest and Plains region, the effects of corn sweat can be felt far and wide, even here in New England. During peak summer heating, huge amounts of additional water vapor are released into the atmosphere, sending temperatures soaring around the country, worsening already hot conditions.
This week’s heat dome, which has blanketed the eastern half of the US and the Midwest with intensely hot temperatures by trapping warm air near the surface, was compounded by the presence of corn sweat in the atmosphere.
The rotation of this high-pressure system has been driving a southwesterly flow toward New England, picking up that added moisture or corn sweat from the Midwest, and with the help of the west-to-east flow of the jet stream, has been funneling more humidity our way. That moisture-laden air has been pushing up heat index values, making it feel a lot hotter.
Take a look at the extra water vapor moving into New England through Friday, amplified by the additional corn sweat from the Corn Belt.
Friday’s temperatures in New England are forecast to soar well into the 90s with high humidity, pushing heat index values or the “feels like” temperature into the triple-digit range. Relief will arrive Friday night when a front pushes through and delivers a shot of relatively cooler and drier air into the region, setting up a comfortable Saturday to enjoy the outdoors.
Andy Vanloocke, associate professor of agriculture and meteorology at Iowa State University, says the corn plants act like straws between the soil, water, and the atmosphere.
“The water that’s evaporating over Iowa right now, a significant portion of it, depending on the weather patterns, 70 to 80 percent will fall again before it exits the Mississippi River Basin,” Vanloocke says. “But some of it will make its way all the way to Boston before eventually falling out. It may even cycle a few times between the land and the atmosphere on its way over there.
“If you’re having a hard time believing that, just think about the amount of smoke you get from a wildfire blowing through thousands of miles,” he says.
Corn is the most abundantly produced crop in the United States, and the plant releases water vapor into the atmosphere at one of the fastest rates among all plants. A single acre of corn can add about 4,000 gallons of water per day into the atmosphere, amplifying the moisture content and increasing dew point and humidity, according to the U.S. Geological Survey.
And, basically, the higher the temperature is, the more moisture the corn will draw from the ground and release, or transpire, into the atmosphere.
“When you have a warm atmosphere with a lot of demand for that water, that leaf area is going to generate a lot of water vapor for the atmosphere,” Vanloocke says.
Many experts believe this corn sweat effect has expanded from a rather local event to a more expansive phenomenon due to climate change.
Besides corn, Vanloocke said, soybeans are just as prevalent and equally efficient at evapotranspiration.
“We should call it soy sweat as much as we call it corn sweat,” he said. “There are about as many corn acres as soybean acres out here in the Corn Belt… and soybean uses just about as much water on a day-to-day basis as corn does.”
Ken Mahan can be reached at ken.mahan@globe.com. Follow him on Instagram @kenmahantheweatherman.
Here is proof that the universe hates you:
You go to a Coldplay show with your paramour thinking you will be safely anonymous in a darkened arena full of 50,000 people with similarly questionable music taste. Suddenly, like the eye of Sauron, the arena kiss-cam falls upon the two of you. Your canoodling mugs are now up there on the Jumbotron, illuminated and 10,000 times larger than life.
If you’re at the concert with your date-who-is-definitely-not-your-spouse and with whom you have a professional relationship that absolutely precludes getting handsy at a Coldplay show, and the spotlight hits you, what is the move?
Counterintuitively, the move is to kiss for the kiss cam, and maybe smile and wave. In short, do what you’re supposed to do in that situation, and, in so doing, be unremarkable so the camera moves on.
The problem is that in this situation the human instinct to cower, hide and radiate high-energy shame particles is so lizard-brain reflexive, you’d have to be the genetic cross of Ethan Hunt and Mr. Spock to suppress it in the moment.
In this very real and not-theoretical situation, two people conspicuously did not suppress the instinct to cower and radiate shame particles. Instead, when the kiss-cam found them, they acted as guilty as a couple on a tryst could possibly act:
It is physically impossible to act any more busted than that. The LeBron James of acting busted1 could not act more busted.
Humans are social animals and naturally wired to recognize deep cringe. Coldplay singer Chris Martin and everyone else in the arena noticed this behavior. Within moments it was all over the Internet and the couple was promptly identified as the married CEO of software company Astronomer.io and his head of human resources who is definitively not his wife. It has since ascended into mainstream national media.2
This is a crisis! A personal crisis. A corporate crisis. And definitely a music taste crisis. Let’s take them in order.
Personal Crisis
He’s getting punched in the face by his wife, right? Possibly literally, likely in the legal sense. Lawyer up and book a hotel room. As for the HR chief, I am not sure of her marital status, so maybe that isn’t an issue. But going nationwide like this is going to haunt her for a while. The Internet is unkind to women at the best of times, and most definitely in these situations. There is already an attempt to memeify the couple in a way that suggests poor understanding of the broader context:
Solid work.
Corporate Crisis
If the CEO is having an affair with someone who doesn’t work at the company, questions of judgment aside, that’s mostly the CEO’s problem. If the CEO is having an affair with his direct report, that’s the company’s problem. These two scenarios require different solutions. I’m a corporate PR guy, not a publicist, so I’ll focus on the company’s problems.
Most companies consider relationships within a chain of command an ethics violation for good reason. No one will think you’re going to be an impartial manager of someone you’re in a sexual relationship with. On what basis are you making promotion decisions? Compensation decisions? Any decisions? I worked at a company where the CEO was turfed out for a relationship with a subordinate that happened before he was CEO, but never disclosed.
And the other party is the HR manager! That’s very bad! Employee behavior and ethics is literally her turf! She’s supposed to know better. What if you’re an employee who wants to make a complaint about the CEO to the HR department? Will you get a fair hearing? What if you don’t like Coldplay?
So it’s bad judgment all around.
Slow down, you say. All we have at the moment is a brief video. It’s suggestive, but not a literal sex tape. We don’t know for sure that the CEO and HR manager are having a relationship. Maybe they were just in an embrace that, while it looked very intimate and inappropriate for colleagues in a direct reporting line, was in fact completely innocent. Maybe he slipped on spilled beer and found his hands around her waist. In slow motion. While smiling.
When I started drafting this, on Friday in Taiwan before a flight home, there was no statement from Astronomer yet. At the time, I wrote this:
The CEO is a board member, and I don’t know what the voting structure at Astronomer is, but if I were the PR advisor for the board I’d recommend they immediately place both executives on leave pending an investigation. It’s a prudent move you can make right away, and it buys some time for you to find the facts and consider longer-term decisions.
That was PR 101, not rocket science, so hold your applause. But it was validating to see that on mid-day Friday U.S. time (while I was in the air) Astronomer posted this statement on X:
“Astronomer is committed to the values and culture that have guided us since our founding. Our leaders are expected to set the standard in both conduct and accountability. The Board of Directors has initiated a formal investigation into this matter and we will have additional details to share very shortly. Alyssa Stoddard was not at the event and no other employees were in the video. Andy Byron has not put out any statement, reports saying otherwise are all incorrect.”
Alyssa Stoddard is another company executive who was mistakenly reported to be at the event, and there was a fake statement from the CEO, Andy Byron, circulating widely on the Internet on Thursday. Hence the two clarifications at the end.
A few hours later, the company posted a follow-up:
“Cofounder and Chief Product Officer Pete DeJoy is currently serving as interim CEO given Andy Byron has been placed on leave.”
Weirdly, neither of these is on their corporate newsroom, and it’s odd to me that they’re separated, even if only by a few hours. But Astronomer is privately held and customers are their main external stakeholder, so I guess they can do what they want on disclosure. Also, what are the “values and culture” that have guided them since their founding? If I were drafting this, I might list a couple of them rather than leaving it to the imagination of obscure PR bloggers.
Finally, there is no mention of the head of HR, a senior executive who reports to the CEO (whom, I remind you, evidence suggests she is in a relationship with). I am curious what was communicated internally, to Astronomer’s employees. She still appears on the company’s executive page, although the CEO does not. I am very surprised that she apparently hasn’t also been suspended and I think it’s a bad look.
Music Taste Crisis
Speaking of bad looks, when you go down, do you want to go down for Coldplay, the nonstick frying pan of pop music?
If you’re doing something sleazy and dangerous, wouldn’t you want to go down for a sleazier and more dangerous band? Peak career Prince, when half of his songs were straightforwardly about fucking and the other half were about Jesus? Early Guns’n’Roses, when they seemed like reptiles that had crawled from the sewers of Hollywood? Or whatever the current incarnation of this kind of sexualized danger is? Idk, man, I’m old. Maybe go down for a Cardi B show. I’d respect that!
If you’re going to a tryst gig, it shouldn’t be an arena show for a mid AOR act calibrated for wine moms looking for a non-threatening evening out. You should be in some smoky, subterranean dive watching an ancient bebop crew called something like, “Nasty-Sax Hawkins and the Heroin Spoons” and where they serve martinis that would delaminate battleship armor.
But Coldplay? Going to Coldplay compounds the error of judgment. You can build a 2x2 risk matrix to analyze this:
Now that I think about it, the fact that they were at a Coldplay concert opens up a few possible PR angles for all parties involved.
For the CEO:
“Yes, we were having an affair, but we were at a Coldplay show so obviously its sexless.”
For the HR executive:
“He’s a monster. He used his power to coerce me into Coldplay. I feel violated.”
For the Company:
“An affair with a subordinate we could forgive, but going to Coldplay is a clear violation of our employee code of conduct. He left us no choice.”
It’s Coldplay game theory! You just have to be the first one to play the card. Who will break first and seize the advantage?
Ultimately, my professional PR advice is this: If you’re going to have a tryst at a Coldplay show, you should use protection. By which I mean that you should both wear Groucho glasses so that you are protected if, against all odds, the kiss-cam finds you.
In fact, now that I think about it, if you’re going to go to Coldplay at all, wear a pair of Groucho glasses.3 Keep you shame secret and spare your loved ones the pain.
Rodney Dangerfield? Discuss!
The excellent 404 Media has written, with more sensitivity than I can muster, about the social media panopticon we’ve created. I recognize that I am contributing to the problem, my intellectual pretensions notwithstanding.
I have sassed the hell out of Coldplay in this post, but given that I wrote about going to go see a Lynyrd Skynyrd / ZZ Top double header not long ago, I realize I am on dangerously thin ice.
CNN —
Public television stations will be “forced to make hard decisions in the weeks and months ahead,” PBS CEO Paula Kerger said Thursday, after the Senate voted in the middle of the night to approve a bill that cancels all the federal funding for the network.
Once the House passes the bill, as expected, the Corporation for Public Broadcasting’s budget will be zeroed out for the first time since 1967, back when television stations still broadcast in black and white.
It is a long-sought victory for President Trump, who has harshly accused PBS and NPR newscasts of being “biased,” and a long-dreaded disruption for local stations that bank on taxpayer support.
Public media executives say some smaller broadcasters will be forced off the air in the months and years to come. That’s because stations in rural areas and smaller communities tend to rely more heavily on the federal subsidy. Stations in larger markets typically have a wider variety of other funding sources, like viewer donations and foundation support.
Kerger said in a statement that “these cuts will significantly impact all of our stations, but will be especially devastating to smaller stations and those serving large rural areas.”
She pointed out that the stations “provide access to free unique local programming and emergency alerts.”
The two Republican senators who voted against the rescission, Lisa Murkowski and Susan Collins, both said they valued those aspects of public media, even while criticizing perceived bias of some NPR programming.
Most other Republicans, however, concentrated on the bias complaints above all else, and argued that the entire system is obsolete in the streaming age.
David Bozell, president of the Media Research Center, which has campaigned against the federal support for decades, celebrated the “historic rollback” in an X post overnight.
“PBS and NPR were chartered to provide objective journalism,” Bozell wrote. “Instead, we got drag shows for kids, gushing coverage of Democrats, and silence or smears for conservatives.”
Public media officials say critics completely distort what actually airs on stations.
Thursday morning’s report about the clawback on NPR’s “Morning Edition,” for example, was studiously neutral, and the hosts pointed out that NPR management was not involved in the news coverage of its own funding dilemma.
“Nearly 3-in-4 Americans say they rely on their public radio stations for alerts and news for their public safety,” NPR CEO Katherine Maher said in a statement, arguing that NPR is a “lifeline.”
Early Thursday morning, America’s Public Television Stations, an advocacy group for the stations, argued that the rescission “defies the will of the American people,” citing both the polls and the fact that Congress actually allocated the next round of funding earlier this year.
In 1967, when Congress created the corporation, it declared that noncommercial TV and radio “for instructional, educational, and cultural purposes” was in the public interest. Shows like “Sesame Street” and “Antiques Roadshow” sprang forth.
The public media system continued to enjoy bipartisan support from lawmakers for many years, even as conservative activists sought to strip away the taxpayer funding. Congress ignored proposals from past Republican presidents to cut the PBS and NPR budgets.
But Trump has proven to be much more assertive. Earlier this year Trump made it a priority to claw back the funding before the Corporation for Public Broadcasting was set to receive it in October.
“For decades, Republicans have promised to cut NPR, but have never done it, until now,” Trump boasted in a Truth Social post last month.
The exact impacts are uncertain, given the complex structure of public media and the various other revenue streams that exist.
But some local stations are already making changes. In New York, the operator of the powerhouse NPR station WNYC said Wednesday that its CEO LaFontaine Oliver is moving into a new position, executive chair, that’s been created in response to the threats to federal funding. Oliver will focus on “new funding models” and try to find financial support from other non-federal sources, the station said.
In San Francisco, the KQED radio and TV network said it is laying off about 15 percent of its staff, citing financial uncertainties.
“Despite today’s setback, we are determined to keep fighting to preserve the essential services we provide to the American public,” Kerger said.
Today is the 20th anniversary of the first commit to the public Django repository!
Ten years ago we threw a multi-day 10th birthday party for Django back in its birthtown of Lawrence, Kansas. As a personal celebration of the 20th, I'm revisiting the talk I gave at that event and writing it up here.
Here's the YouTube video. Below is a full transcript, plus my slides and some present-day annotations.
Presented 11th July 2015 at Django Birthday in Lawrence, Kansas
My original talk title, as you'll see on your programs, was "Some Things I've Built with Django." But then I realized that we're here in the birthplace of Django, celebrating the 10th birthday of the framework, and nobody's told the origin story yet. So, I've switched things around a little bit. I'm going to talk about the origin story of Django, and then if I have time, I'll do the self-indulgent bit and talk about some of the projects I've shipped since then.
I think Jacob's introduction hit on something I've never really realized about myself. I do love shipping things. The follow-up and the long-term thing I'm not quite so strong on. And that came to focus when I was putting together this talk and realized that basically every project I'm going to show you, I had to dig out of the Internet Archive.
Ten years on from writing this talk I'm proud that I've managed to overcome my weakness in following-up - I'm now actively maintaining a bewildering array of projects, having finally figured out how to maintain things in addition to creating them!
But that said, I will tell you the origin story of Django.
I put this annotated version of my 10 year old talk together using a few different tools.
I fetched the audio from YouTube using yt-dlp:
yt-dlp -x --audio-format mp3 \
"https://youtube.com/watch?v=wqii_iX0RTs"
I then ran the mp3 through MacWhisper to generate an initial transcript. I cleaned that up by pasting it into Claude Opus 4 with this prompt:
Take this audio transcript of a talk and clean it up very slightly - I want paragraph breaks and tiny edits like removing ums or "sort of" or things like that, but other than that the content should be exactly as presented.
I converted a PDF of the slides into a JPEG per page using this command (found with the llm-cmd plugin):
pdftoppm -jpeg -jpegopt quality=70 django-birthday.pdf django-birthday
Then I used my annotated presentations tool (described here) to combine the slides and transcript, making minor edits and adding links using Markdown in that interface.
You are only seeing the long-form articles from my blog. Subscribe to /atom/everything/ to get all of my posts, or take a look at my other subscription options.